Enter password to access article.
The Low Income Housing Institute was founded in 1991 by Sharon Lee. It operates more than 3,800 housing units across 80+ sites in six counties. LIHI runs 14 tiny house villages, making it the largest tiny house operator in the country. The organization employs 673 people and operates on a Housing First model, meaning residents are not required to demonstrate sobriety or treatment compliance to receive housing.
LIHI's portfolio spans emergency shelter, transitional housing, permanent supportive housing, and workforce housing. But the tiny house villages are the signature program, and the source of the most serious questions about oversight, safety, and accountability.
Sharon Lee has served as Executive Director for 33 years, since LIHI's founding in 1991. Her compensation has doubled from $167,000 in 2011 to $338,376 in 2024. CFO Lynne Behar earns $202,000.
The board is chaired by Melinda Nichols. All board members report $0 in compensation and 0.5 hours per week in time commitment. For an organization with $490 million in assets and $108 million in annual revenue, this level of board engagement raises basic governance questions.
There is no publicly disclosed succession plan. Lee has run the organization since its founding. She is LIHI.
LIHI's growth over the last five years has been extraordinary. Revenue tripled. Assets tripled. Government funding dominates the revenue mix.
| Year | Revenue | Expenses | Net Income | Net Assets |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | $108.6M | $79.2M | +$29.4M | $490.1M |
| 2023 | $129.3M | $76.6M | +$52.6M | $411.0M |
| 2022 | $75.6M | $52.1M | +$23.6M | $349.4M |
| 2021 | $49.4M | $36.0M | +$13.4M | $253.9M |
| 2020 | $31.8M | $26.7M | +$5.2M | $161.1M |
Revenue tripled from $31.8M (2020) to $108.6M (2024)
Assets tripled from $161.1M (2020) to $490.1M (2024)
$68.6M in government funding in 2023: state $40.9M, city $24.1M, county $3.6M
LIHI is consistently profitable. It is accumulating assets at a rapid pace. The question is not whether the organization is financially healthy. The question is whether the services match the scale of the funding.
In August 2022, three people died in LIHI tiny house villages in less than 48 hours.
On August 28, a resident was stabbed to death at Friendship Heights Village. The following day, August 29, a second resident was found dead of an overdose at the same village. The body was in a state of advanced decomposition, meaning the death had likely occurred days earlier without detection. On the same day, a separate overdose death occurred at LIHI's Interbay village.
The King County Regional Homelessness Authority accused LIHI of failing to report these deaths within the required 24-hour window. KCRHA issued a corrective action plan in September 2022.
Sharon Lee denied the violations. She accused KCRHA of targeting LIHI and characterized the corrective action as politically motivated. The pattern is consistent: when problems surface, Lee disputes the findings rather than addressing the underlying failures.
In February 2026, KCRHA rescinded a $3 million grant that would have funded 60 new tiny houses outside a youth detention center. LIHI failed to secure a site within the required timeline. The money was redirected to the Salvation Army.
LIHI appealed the decision, blaming KCRHA for causing delays. This is a recurring dynamic: LIHI takes on contracts, fails to deliver, and then blames the funder when consequences follow.
At Licton Springs Village, crime in the surrounding neighborhood doubled (a 100% increase) during the period the village operated, while North Precinct crime overall fell 7%. The village was subsequently closed.
Safe Seattle filed lawsuits alleging zoning violations at multiple LIHI village sites. North Seattle Neighbors published open letters documenting resident complaints, including mistreatment by village staff and unsafe conditions.
Community opposition to tiny house villages is not a matter of NIMBYism. It is a response to documented increases in crime, drug activity, and safety incidents at specific sites operated by a specific organization.
Current and former LIHI staff have alleged that the organization deliberately underbids government contracts to win them, then returns to funders seeking supplemental money when it cannot deliver the contracted services at the bid price.
Mutual aid volunteers who worked with LIHI villages documented what they described as "repeated stories of abuse, neglect, and dishonest practices." These accounts are consistent with an organization that takes on more than it can handle, then cuts corners on service delivery to manage the gap.
Nonprofit affordable housing vacancy rates in Seattle increased fivefold from 2017 to 2024, reaching 11%. LIHI was referenced in Seattle Times reporting on nonprofits struggling with vacancies and, in some cases, selling buildings despite holding hundreds of millions in assets.
LIHI holds $490 million in net assets. It is accumulating property faster than it can fill or maintain it. Asset growth has become the metric, not housing outcomes.
1. What are LIHI's actual transition outcomes? Of the thousands of people who enter tiny house villages, how many move into permanent housing within 12 months? What percentage cycle back into unsheltered homelessness?
2. Does LIHI systematically underbid government contracts? What is the gap between original contract amounts and final costs (including supplemental funding requests) across the last five years?
3. How does an organization that failed to detect a decomposing body in one of its own villages justify its safety and oversight protocols?
4. With $490 million in assets and consistent annual surpluses, why is LIHI still dependent on government funding for 63% of its revenue? Where is the asset growth going?
5. After 33 years with no succession plan, what happens to a $490 million organization when Sharon Lee leaves?
On April 12, 2026, The Burnham Civic submitted a formal complaint to the HUD Office of Inspector General citing LIHI's $103.5 million in federal expenditures, its KCRHA contract clawback ($3M rescinded in 2024-2025), and the broader pattern of oversight failure across the WA-500 Continuum of Care. LIHI has clean audits, but clean audits do not answer the question of why a nonprofit housing provider has accumulated $490 million in assets and a $52 million single-year surplus while operating tiny home villages with documented safety failures. TBC does not publish reports and wait. We file complaints, we name decision makers, and we follow through until there are consequences.
Plymouth Housing · DESC · Catholic Community Services · KCRHA · HDC
Want to support this operation, contribute expertise, or join as a member? Tell us who you are and how you want to help.